4 Comments
Apr 13, 2023Liked by David Chen

Well, It’s the age of “me me me - me first me first - I did it - I did it” ... which is supported by the current theory that ‘consequence’ is a demand of the weak. Ooph. Jeff’s head will explode (if you didn’t immediately dm him a warning already). It’s gotten to the point if a building was on fire, instead of running out, some people would rather run to the phone to be the first to report it. Yikes.

Expand full comment
Apr 13, 2023Liked by David Chen

I believe a lot of this is related to how social media has changed our incentive structures. The human experience has been stripped away and profit becomes the only driver. When I wrote a series on social media’s impact in January, I learned how much these incentives have changed our brains and manipulated our emotions. Media companies are made of people after all.

Expand full comment

Only to slightly ruffle some feathers here, but I do think the spoiler-averse attitude tends to overlook the _how_ of the filmmaking, in favor of _what_. In this case, I wasn’t blown away because of what happened in the episode, but how it was executed. I watched it again last night, fully aware of what was going to happen, and still couldn’t stop watching. I actually would question the very word “spoiler” because in the end, why happens in the story is only one part of the experience.

That said, I would of course never knowingly “spoil” a story for anyone. Just to be clear.

Expand full comment

Yep. I couldn't watch live, but saw headlines teasing something major happened. I assumed someone died, but there are several people it could have been. Then I saw the LA Times headline and got spoiled. I don't subscribe to the "spoilers make people enjoy things more" point of view. It ruined it for me. Made me kinda angry.

Now I'm in a race against time to watch yesterday's Mandalorian. Shhh.

Expand full comment